From the Good Library Guide : 1st February
'Lack of Leadership Costs Money'

Back

'Lack of Leadership Costs Money' : The Good Library Guide : 1st February

LACK OF LEADERSHIP COSTS MONEY

BIC has published its latest appraisal of compliance with the standards specification of the national E4 libraries project -- these are those local authorities and suppliers using RFID (Radio Frequency Identification on library books) and EDI (Electronic Data Interchange).

What it says is that most suppliers either comply with standards or are committed to complying.  But out of more than 200 library authorities in the UK, only 10 have yet signed up and have achieved accreditation.  The programme is now over 2 years old.

I don't think anyone effectively explains to councils and library authorities why it is so expensive to allow councils to operate their own physical and electronic specifications for supply of goods and systems.  Not only does any supplier have to be able to respond to orders requiring any one of two-hundred processes and all the associated communication but, within the councils themselves, each council is set up to maintain, specify and tender for its own specifications.  Each council library service has its own experts and systems staff to define these specs and monitor performance against them .  There is, however, no need at all for any variation between councils of any kind.  The cost of meeting these varying specs is huge.  Consortia working has had a small effect on the workload but there is little evidence that it has reduced costs in councils.

For any one council it appears that they are doing what they have always assumed it is their job and role to do - to maintain their own catalogues and systems in their own way.  They don't see the broader picture - and no one ever describes it to them.  The wastage has been estimated at £200m pa -- about £50m is the cost of library suppliers production facilities, and the other £150m is the attendant repeated structures within councils to which suppliers are responding.

In particular, nearly all the general Book supply to public libraries has now reduced to just three suppliers - these are the national wholesalers Bertrams and Gardners and the independent Peters (who specialise in Childrens' books).  In addition there is a small amount of academic supply which comes from UK and US major wholesalers.  The market has become non-competitive and the evidence of this is that as book discounts have risen to retailers, even in the past 12 months (because of retailer discounting to the public) - discounts to libraries, which are generally fixed by contract for 3 years have barely risen at all.  In other words, yet again, the local government purchasing mechanism is producing poor value and the library sector has failed to notice and address the issue.

This problem is library specific.  It will not be addressed by national initiatives of sharing council management, because it is the library profession who are allowed to specifiy what they believe is the work that needs to be done.  They have no inclination to address this question -- bluntly, there is no incentive for them to do so.  They need to be told what to do (by their employers).

We are continuing to throw huge amounts of money away and it seems ridiculous to hear pleadings fom Central quangoes about hard times and to watch libraries being closed and services reduced when this question has been sitting unaddressed for years.  We need some leadership.

In this specific instance what leadership means is :

- a professional appraisal of the issues and the costs
- a discussion with those responsible for both the service and its budgets (ie local councillors that
   hold the public libraries in their portfolio)
- a clear and evaluated proposal from those in a position to make one
- A concensus among a group of councils with agreement as to what to do, with a timetable.
  Someone takes responsibility, answering to the public for the expenditure of their money.
- A firm hand on progress to ensure each of the appropriate parties does what they have agreed and
  that the results are what was foreseen
- Completion
- Public and professional clarity throughout